![]() The result was journalistic glee that we impeached a president for crimes that he did not commit but exempted another president, Biden, who had likely committed them. Trump was right that the Bidens were knee deep in Ukrainian bribes and influence peddling.Īnd that the whistleblower had no firsthand knowledge of the Trump call but was spoon fed a script cooked up by the gadfly Vindman and California Rep. Then the truth emerged that unlike Joe Biden, Trump never threatened to cancel aid, but merely to delay it. The same biased reporters now claimed that the heroic Andrew Vindman had caught Trump fabricating lies about the Bidens - given Joe Biden was a possible 2020 opponent - to force Ukraine to investigate them or lose American foreign aid. Instead, the media went next right on to “the phone call” and “impeachment.” ![]() Was there any media confessional that perhaps Robert Mueller and his left-wing legal team (the giddy media-dubbed “all-stars,” “dream team,” and “hunter killers”) proved a colossal waste of time? When all such “evidence” was proven to be a complete fraud cooked up through Hillary Clinton’s stealthy hiring of and collusion with a discredited ex-British spy, a Russian fabulist at the Brookings Institution and a Clinton toady in Moscow, did the media apologize for their untruth? Such a cynical view of the media is justified given their record of both incompetence and unapologetic deceit.įrom 2015 to 2019, we were suffocated 24/7 with lies like “Russian collusion,” “Putin’s puppet,” “election rigging” and the “Steele dossier.” So will we at last expect the media finally to confront the truth?Īnswer - only if Joe Biden’s cognitive and physical health continues to deteriorate geometrically to the point that he can no longer finish his term or run for re-election - and thus becomes expendable. In denial, the media has instead pivoted with hysterical glee over various weaponized prosecutions of former President Donald Trump.īut now, to use a progressive catchphrase, the proverbial “walls are closing in” on Joe Biden. Those two crimes - bribery and treason - are specifically delineated in the Constitution as impeachable offenses. Yet the media can no longer hide the reality that the president of the United States likely took bribes to influence or alter U.S. They attacked the former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who now alleges Joe Biden was likely bribed by Ukrainians. They played dumb about Joe Biden’s use of pseudonyms and alias email accounts to hide thousands of his communications to Hunter and associates. They again discounted Hunter’s laptop that explicitly demonstrated that Hunter was whining that he had handed over large percentages of his income to father Joe - variously referred to as the Big Guy and a “ten percent” recipient on many deals. Reporters ignored the Ukrainians who claimed Joe Biden himself talked to them about quid pro quo arrangements. Later, as the evidence from IRS whistleblowers mounted, the White House stonewalled subpoenaed efforts and sought to craft an outrageous plea deal reduction in Hunter’s legal exposure. The public would have learned that Hunter’s business associates and his laptop proved Joe was deeply involved in his son’s illicit businesses. Had journalists just been honest and independent, then-candidate Joe Biden might have lost a presidential debate and even the 2020 election. ![]() Yet, the media continued to misinform by serially ignoring these facts. The president further prevaricated that he had no involvement in Hunter’s various shakedown schemes. Joe Biden lied repeatedly when he claimed he knew nothing of his son Hunter’s influence-peddling businesses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |